diff options
| author | tv <tv@krebsco.de> | 2026-11-08 21:55:00 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | tv <tv@krebsco.de> | 2026-11-08 22:59:03 +0100 |
| commit | 64c3c47d9bbc8ca2e6352bdcf79a91b1d1669289 (patch) | |
| tree | 7339bc385934a3c60a226f58fc1482329ea9c2f0 /src/document | |
| parent | f48302e101b8f6814a32e834259588cd11731957 (diff) | |
screen: judged after the policy is gone, too
Review 3, R4: whether a batch was judged followed the receiving
document's policy now (and whether the batch writes one). After the
policy was removed, or replaced by a version the node doesn't know,
changes written under it and received late went in unjudged, while
nodes that had them earlier judged them; REFUSALS gave up likewise.
Screening now remembers that the document held a policy, known or not
(Screening::policed), and judges what it receives while it does, each
change by the policy at its dependencies; REFUSALS judges then too
(not under a policy the node doesn't know, as before). Not across a
restart, which access.md says.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/document')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/document/bench.rs | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/document/bench.rs b/src/document/bench.rs index 887ced0..39a8dc7 100644 --- a/src/document/bench.rs +++ b/src/document/bench.rs @@ -664,6 +664,7 @@ fn screening_costs(workload: &str, doc: &Document) { let screened = crate::access::screen::apply( &mut empty, Epoch::GENESIS, + false, changes, &mut crate::access::screen::Waiting::default(), &mut crate::access::screen::Refusals::default(), |