From 6b0503b20d1918f4eed1975cf2104a61fd51abef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: skullY Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 01:37:05 -0700 Subject: update the faq --- docs/faq.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/faq.md b/docs/faq.md index c46861030c..d7f2a6f4fd 100644 --- a/docs/faq.md +++ b/docs/faq.md @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ TMK was originally designed and implemented by [Jun Wako](https://github.com/tmk From a technical standpoint QMK builds upon TMK by adding several new features. Most notably QMK has expanded the number of available keycodes and uses these to implement advanced features like `S()`, `LCTL()`, and `MO()`. You can see a complete list of these keycodes in [Quantum Keycodes](quantum_keycodes.html). -From a project and community management standpoint TMK prefers to have keyboards maintained in separate forks while QMK prefers to have keyboards maintained in one central repository. +From a project and community management standpoint TMK maintains all the officially supported keyboards by himself, with a bit of community support. Separate community maintained forks exist or can be created for other keyboards. Only a few keymaps are provided by default, so users typically don't share keymaps with each other. QMK encourages sharing of both keyboards and keymaps through a centrally managed repository, accepting all pull requests that follows the quality standards. These are mostly community maintained, but the QMK team also helps when necessary. + +Both approaches have their merits and their drawbacks, and code flows freely between TMK and QMK when it makes sense. # Debug Console ## hid_listen can't recognize device -- cgit v1.2.3