diff options
author | fredizzimo <fsundvik@gmail.com> | 2020-03-13 20:09:38 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2020-03-13 14:09:38 -0400 |
commit | 9e8767917d628afd3dc43759d1d50151c61944a1 (patch) | |
tree | 0060b8968d5e9df38c37b375e4eb2d6a0d65ac0c /tests/basic/test_keypress.cpp | |
parent | f89439ae09c06d0e85f59af2bc5e020d141f23d6 (diff) |
Fix pressing two keys with the same keycode but different modifiers (#2710)
* Fix extra keyboard report during test_fixture teardown
* Add tests for pressing two keys with only different modifers
* Fix #1708
When two keys that use the same keycode, but different modifiers were
pressed at the same time, the second keypress wasn't registered. This is
fixed by forcing a key release when we detect a new press for the same
keycode.
* Fix the NKRO version of is_key_pressed
* Fix uninitalized loop variable
Co-authored-by: Jack Humbert <jack.humb@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/basic/test_keypress.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/basic/test_keypress.cpp | 118 |
1 files changed, 117 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tests/basic/test_keypress.cpp b/tests/basic/test_keypress.cpp index e5247911cb..551458a0d9 100644 --- a/tests/basic/test_keypress.cpp +++ b/tests/basic/test_keypress.cpp @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ using testing::_; using testing::Return; +using testing::InSequence; class KeyPress : public TestFixture {}; @@ -121,4 +122,119 @@ TEST_F(KeyPress, RightShiftLeftControlAndCharWithTheSameKey) { EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_RSFT, KC_RCTRL))); EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport())); keyboard_task(); -}
\ No newline at end of file +} + +TEST_F(KeyPress, PressPlusEqualReleaseBeforePress) { + TestDriver driver; + InSequence s; + + press_key(1, 1); // KC_PLUS + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT))); + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT, KC_EQL))); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + release_key(1, 1); // KC_PLUS + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT))); + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport())); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + press_key(0, 1); // KC_EQL + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_EQL))); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + release_key(0, 1); // KC_EQL + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport())); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); +} + +TEST_F(KeyPress, PressPlusEqualDontReleaseBeforePress) { + TestDriver driver; + InSequence s; + + press_key(1, 1); // KC_PLUS + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT))); + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT, KC_EQL))); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + press_key(0, 1); // KC_EQL + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport())); + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_EQL))); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + release_key(1, 1); //KC_PLS + // BUG: Should really still return KC_EQL, but this is fine too + // It's also called twice for some reason + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport())).Times(2); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + release_key(0, 1); // KC_EQL + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport())); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); +} + +TEST_F(KeyPress, PressEqualPlusReleaseBeforePress) { + TestDriver driver; + InSequence s; + + press_key(0, 1); // KC_EQL + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_EQL))); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + release_key(0, 1); // KQ_EQL + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport())); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + press_key(1, 1); // KC_PLUS + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT))); + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT, KC_EQL))); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + release_key(1, 1); // KC_PLUS + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT))); + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport())); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); +} + +TEST_F(KeyPress, PressEqualPlusDontReleaseBeforePress) { + TestDriver driver; + InSequence s; + + press_key(0, 1); // KC_EQL + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_EQL))); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + press_key(1, 1); // KC_PLUS + // BUG: The sequence is a bit strange, but it works, the end result is that + // KC_PLUS is sent + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT, KC_EQL))); + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT))); + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT, KC_EQL))); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + release_key(0, 1); //KC_EQL + // I guess it's fine to still report shift here + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT))); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); + + release_key(1, 1); // KC_PLUS + // This report is not needed + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT))); + EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport())); + run_one_scan_loop(); + testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver); +} |