Add basic timing support, and SFT_T tests

Also expose some bugs...

1 files changed, 96 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/basic/tapping.cpp b/tests/basic/tapping.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c158e17189
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/basic/tapping.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+/* Copyright 2017 Fred Sundvik
+ *
+ * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include "test_common.h"
+#include "action_tapping.h"
+
+using testing::_;
+using testing::InSequence;
+
+class Tapping : public TestFixture {};
+
+TEST_F(Tapping, TapA_SHFT_T_KeyReportsKey) {
+    TestDriver driver;
+    InSequence s;
+
+    press_key(7, 0);
+    // Tapping keys does nothing on press
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
+    run_one_scan_loop();
+    release_key(7, 0);
+    // First we get the key press
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
+    // Then the release
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
+    run_one_scan_loop();
+}
+
+TEST_F(Tapping, HoldA_SHFT_T_KeyReportsShift) {
+    TestDriver driver;
+    InSequence s;
+
+    press_key(7, 0);
+    // Tapping keys does nothing on press
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
+    idle_for(TAPPING_TERM);
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT)));
+    run_one_scan_loop();
+}
+
+TEST_F(Tapping, ANewTapWithinTappingTermIsBuggy) {
+    TestDriver driver;
+    InSequence s;
+
+    press_key(7, 0);
+    // Tapping keys does nothing on press
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
+    run_one_scan_loop();
+    release_key(7, 0);
+    // First we get the key press
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
+    // Then the release
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
+    run_one_scan_loop();
+
+    // This sends KC_P, even if it should do nothing
+    press_key(7, 0);
+    // This test should not succed if everything works correctly
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
+    run_one_scan_loop();
+    release_key(7, 0);
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
+    idle_for(TAPPING_TERM + 1);
+
+    // On the other hand, nothing is sent if we are outside the tapping term
+    press_key(7, 0);
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
+    run_one_scan_loop();
+    release_key(7, 0);
+
+    // First we get the key press
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
+    // Then the release
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
+    idle_for(TAPPING_TERM + 1);
+
+    // Now we are geting into strange territory, as the hold registers too early here
+    // But the stranges part is:
+    // If TAPPING_TERM + 1 above is changed to TAPPING_TERM or TAPPING_TERM + 2 it doesn't
+    press_key(7, 0);
+    // Shouldn't be called here really
+    EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT))).Times(1);
+    idle_for(TAPPING_TERM);
+}