| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The osmo_hexdump of the output in sh_chk() omitted the last byte of the
returned bytes from the osmo_nibble_shift_*() functions.
Determine the number of bytes from nibbles divided by two plus one for any odd
nibble number. Output this number of bytes of output data.
Memset the output buffer to get well-defined bytes for unwritten places.
Also assert that we have enough buffer length for all nibbles.
Change-Id: I011f42bca555caec0dfe8688ff1f28303fa04fad
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously while testing osmo_nibble_shift_left_unal() following error was
triggered by AddressSanitizer upon offs == 12 and the last sh_chk line, i.e.
shift left of 12 nibbles from in2:
==3890== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0xbff5b5b6 at pc 0xb6186862 bp 0xbff5b4a8 sp 0xbff5b49c
READ of size 1 at 0xbff5b5b6 thread T0
#0 0xb6186861 (/home/msuraev/source/gsm/libosmocore/src/.libs/libosmocore.so.7.0.0+0xc861)
#1 0x8049d8b (/home/msuraev/source/gsm/libosmocore/tests/bits/.libs/lt-bitrev_test+0x8049d8b)
#2 0x804a9d1 (/home/msuraev/source/gsm/libosmocore/tests/bits/.libs/lt-bitrev_test+0x804a9d1)
#3 0xb5fe3af2 (/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.19.so+0x19af2)
#4 0x8048a30 (/home/msuraev/source/gsm/libosmocore/tests/bits/.libs/lt-bitrev_test+0x8048a30)
Address 0xbff5b5b6 is located at offset 38 in frame <main> of T0's stack:
This frame has 3 object(s):
[32, 38) 'in2'
[96, 104) 'out'
[160, 168) 'in1'
The reason is incorrect range in test cycle. Fix it and adjust test
output accordingly.
Tweaked-by: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de>
Fixes: OW#1589 ("undefined behavior in libosmocore triggered by tests")
Change-Id: I5eb3f600290c05b4ab9ac2450a28d616e6b415fd
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The actual code is from OsmoBTS' tch.c by Harald Welte. Add unit tests,
doxygen annotation and extra memory safety check. Those functions are
used in several BTS implementations but seems generic enough to be
generally useful.
Change-Id: I2b1901c4161e8035f059585901dca593b661556d
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Not doing so seems to break the BSD build
Signed-off-by: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Submitted-by: Max <max.suraev@fairwaves.co>
Signed-off-by: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
|
|
|
Sometimes we need stuff like reversing every bit in each byte (but not
the byte-order).
|
