| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I01f837ac4c8644c0851c77c3f42eb44353cef0d7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Let's fix some erroneous/accidential references to wrong license,
update copyright information where applicable and introduce a
SPDX-License-Identifier to all files.
Change-Id: I39af26c6aaaf5c926966391f6565fc5936be21af
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Considering the various styles and implications found in the sources, edit
scores of files to follow the same API doc guidelines around the doxygen
grouping and the \file tag.
Many files now show a short description in the generated API doc that was so
far only available as C comment.
The guidelines and reasoning behind it is documented at
https://osmocom.org/projects/cellular-infrastructure/wiki/Guidelines_for_API_documentation
In some instances, remove file comments and add to the corresponding group
instead, to be shared among several files (e.g. bitvec).
Change-Id: Ifa70e77e90462b5eb2b0457c70fd25275910c72b
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Especially for short descriptions, it is annoying to have to type \brief for
every single API doc.
Drop all \brief and enable the AUTOBRIEF feature of doxygen, which always takes
the first sentence of an API doc as the brief description.
Change-Id: I11a8a821b065a128108641a2a63fb5a2b1916e87
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As outlined by mail on the 13th of July the tree based approach to
decoding in the PCU is faster by order of magnitude. Instead of having a
slow implementation in the library and a quick one in the PCU, let's
only have a quick one in the PCU and at some point in the future move it
to libosmocore.
Execute the plan and remove t4_decode.
Change-Id: I021424444625a097560d086c217c81eac4a5ee44
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This adds and improves doxygen API descriptions all over libosmocore,
reducing the 'white spots' that don't have any documentation.
|
|
|
Add bit map encoder and decoder functions: decoder is fully functional
while encoder is good enough for testing - no backtracking to find
the best possible compression is implemented. If somebody is willing to
implement MS side of EDGE than this has to be expanded.
Add corresponding tests.
N. B: the encoding is implemented according to ETSI TS 44.060 which is
slightly different from T4 used for fax according to CCITT G31D (RFC 804).
Ticket: OW#2407
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Signed-off-by: Max <msuraev@sysmocom.de>
|
