aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/simtest/policy.rs
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* envelope: a signed value names its swarmtv3 days1-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | Review 3.1, part of finding 12: a signed value's payload bound path, user, time and prev, but not the swarm. A user with the same name and key in two swarms could have an envelope replayed from one into the other, wherever the path holds no envelope yet (prev ""). The payload now names the swarm (`swarm`), and a node takes an envelope only for its own. /auth/whoami says the swarm, and continuum-signed and the example in api.md sign it. Wire version 44: nodes before this refuse such envelopes, and those after refuse the old ones.
* simtest: the forged write refused by whichever node judges it firsttv3 days1-4/+9
| | | | | | | a_swarm_judging_every_change waited for c's forged write to be refused by a, b and d each. The first to judge it tells c, which drops it before the others may have it: wait for a refusal on any of them, then for c to drop it.
* simtest: refused by whichever node judges firsttv3 days1-10/+18
| | | | | | | | In a_strict_swarm and sealed_values, c's forged writes were waited for to be refused by a and by b. Whichever judges them first tells c, which drops them before the other may have judged them (it waits for their signature, or never gets them): wait for a refusal on either, then for c to drop them.
* access: a node judges its own changes before they leavetv3 days1-6/+88
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The API checks the path a request asks for; the rules judge everything the change does. Where they disagreed, the honest node's change was refused by every other node, and with signatures required the node was refused as a whole. The plan had both gates run the same judgement. Under a policy, each change a node makes (its own writes and those through the API) is now judged by rules::judge as receivers will judge it, before it is signed or sent; one every node would refuse is rolled back (the document forked at the heads before it, same actor: the change never left) and the request refused with 403 (StoreError:: Refused). rules::judge_held, judging a change the document holds, moves from swarm::refusals to access::rules for both. The simulations that play a member past its own checks write with a helper that bypasses them (forge). Review finding 3 (the same judgement at both gates).
* access: an epoch's root is never droppedtv3 days1-0/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A REFUSALS naming the swarm's first change made the node receiving it judge that change again in a document that isn't empty, refuse it as "a change without dependencies that isn't the epoch's root", and drop it with everything built on it: its whole document. The first epoch's root is now the first change a document holds, as it comes to an empty one or as it is in one; a change judged again on a peer's word is never refused for having no dependencies; and drop_taken refuses to drop an epoch's root, or anything that would leave nothing kept, logging an error instead. Review finding 1 (critical).
* simtest: members against the rules, and a policy unknowntv4 days1-0/+102
| | | | | | | | A member writing past its API's checks is refused, told, drops its change and is taken again; a node under a policy it doesn't know takes no writes and syncs on. Auth plan M6 (tests).
* swarm: changes taken unjudged, dropped (REFUSALS)tv4 days1-9/+83
| | | | | | | | | A node refusing changes a peer brought tells it which broke a rule; the peer judges them itself, and if its rules refuse them too, drops them with all built on them (its document forked without them, a fresh actor), quarantining its own writes among them. Wire version 42. Auth plan M6 (rejoin on taint).
* access: members refused as a wholetv4 days1-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | With signatures required, a member whose own change broke a rule is refused as a whole: sent nothing, shown in /peers (refused), in stats (sync.refusedPeers) and on the dashboard, until a change of its is taken again or the epoch changes. Auth plan M6 (diverged standing).
* simtest: sealed valuestv4 days1-1/+81
| | | | | | | A value sealed for its declared readers goes everywhere; one sealed for a stranger too, or plain, gets nothing past the others. Auth plan M8.
* simtest: a strict swarmtv4 days1-1/+154
| | | | | | | | Signed values everywhere, carried over by a remake and replaced after it; a member writing the registry or a signed path plain gets nothing past the others. Auth plan M7.
* access: --bootstrap-keystv4 days1-2/+2
| | | | | | | The first users' SSH keys, recorded at genesis with their entries, so a swarm can be strict from its start. Auth plan M7.
* simtest: the policy, and a remake under ittv4 days1-0/+164
A swarm judging every change: honest writes everywhere, a joining node registers, a forged write stays where it was made; a compaction under the policy refuses nothing honest. Auth plan M6.